<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Confessions of a She-Geek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://taholten.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://taholten.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Various observations about pop culture, the media, current events, and other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:21:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Where Have All the Verbs Gone? by Alan</title>
		<link>http://taholten.wordpress.com/2008/05/14/where-have-all-the-verbs-gone/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taholten.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-8</guid>
		<description>I believe the habit is a throwback to the days of newspaper journalism, when headline space was short and an editor sometimes had to be very creative to come up with a succinct-yet-descriptive headline.

My suspicion is that verbs are still around, they&#039;ve just taken refuge as nouns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the habit is a throwback to the days of newspaper journalism, when headline space was short and an editor sometimes had to be very creative to come up with a succinct-yet-descriptive headline.</p>
<p>My suspicion is that verbs are still around, they&#8217;ve just taken refuge as nouns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Please won&#8217;t someone think of the dandelions? by Alan</title>
		<link>http://taholten.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/please-wont-someone-think-of-the-dandelions/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taholten.wordpress.com/?p=9#comment-7</guid>
		<description>When I lived in NJ, we told our 5-year-old to only play in grass that had dandelions. If there were dandelions, you could be assured that the lawn had not been chemically sprayed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I lived in NJ, we told our 5-year-old to only play in grass that had dandelions. If there were dandelions, you could be assured that the lawn had not been chemically sprayed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Common Sense, Isn&#8217;t by Alan</title>
		<link>http://taholten.wordpress.com/2008/06/17/common-sense-isnt/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taholten.wordpress.com/?p=12#comment-6</guid>
		<description>A curious example of manipulating people&#039;s automatic trust of the Internet came when I received a forward of the infamous &quot;Barack Obama is a Muslim extremist!&quot; e-mail. It began (and I&#039;m paraphrasing from memory only slightly), &quot;There&#039;s no need to look this up on Snopes because we checked and it&#039;s TRUE!&quot; Of course, anyone who &lt;i&gt;did&lt;/i&gt; look it up on Snopes would have found that practically every sentence in the e-mail contained a slanderous falsehood. But it&#039;s interesting that whoever wrote it deliberately relied on people&#039;s tendency to assume that because they were told &lt;i&gt;sans&lt;/i&gt; evidence that some site on the Internet said it was true, it must be.

Speaking of automatic trust of the Internet, isn&#039;t it also curious that--at least where the Internet is concerned--we have swung 180 degrees from the days when technology was automatically &lt;i&gt;dis&lt;/i&gt;trusted? Think of all the cautionary tales that were written about how technology would harm us. Now the Internet has become as trusted (and misused) a source of information as television, newspapers, and libraries once were.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A curious example of manipulating people&#8217;s automatic trust of the Internet came when I received a forward of the infamous &#8220;Barack Obama is a Muslim extremist!&#8221; e-mail. It began (and I&#8217;m paraphrasing from memory only slightly), &#8220;There&#8217;s no need to look this up on Snopes because we checked and it&#8217;s TRUE!&#8221; Of course, anyone who <i>did</i> look it up on Snopes would have found that practically every sentence in the e-mail contained a slanderous falsehood. But it&#8217;s interesting that whoever wrote it deliberately relied on people&#8217;s tendency to assume that because they were told <i>sans</i> evidence that some site on the Internet said it was true, it must be.</p>
<p>Speaking of automatic trust of the Internet, isn&#8217;t it also curious that&#8211;at least where the Internet is concerned&#8211;we have swung 180 degrees from the days when technology was automatically <i>dis</i>trusted? Think of all the cautionary tales that were written about how technology would harm us. Now the Internet has become as trusted (and misused) a source of information as television, newspapers, and libraries once were.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
